Clement Chidekh vs Nathan Trouve Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 19 May at 07:03 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
C. Chidekh vs N. Trouve

FRA
1
Win
Played
0
Win

FRA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Chidekh 1 - 0 Trouve
They have played 3 sets in total, with Clement Chidekh winning 2 and Nathan Trouve winning 1. The last match between Clement Chidekh and Nathan Trouve was at the Tbilisi Challenger, 19-05-2025, Round: Q3, Surface: Hard, with Clement Chidekh getting the victory 6-4 5-7 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Chidekh | 1 |
| Trouve | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(Q3) Tbilisi Challenger(05-19-25)
C. Chidekh vs N. Trouve H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $13,980 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 65.20% (193-103) | Career Total W/L | 37.93% (11-18) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 12 | Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0.00% (0-1) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
C. Chidekh vs N. Trouve Match Preview:
- When looking at second serve performance, Chidekh shows a stronger form, securing 44.69% of points compared to Trouve's 39.13%. This could give Chidekh an edge in maintaining serve pressure.
- In return game stats, Trouve is slightly more effective on the opponent's second serve, winning 51.85% of points versus Chidekh's 50.18%. Could this give Trouve an advantage in breaking serve?
- Trouve performs better in first serve returns, with 30.43% over Chidekh's 26.54%, suggesting an ability to counter strong serves effectively.
- Under pressure, Chidekh excels by saving 55.65% of breakpoints, a critical factor in tight matches, while Trouve saves just 33.33%.
- Looking at overall match performance, Chidekh has a higher win percentage of 56.94% compared to Trouve's 44.44% over the past year, pointing towards a consistent edge.
- Chidekh's best surface is Hard, with a 69% win rate, offering a significant boost if the match is played on this surface. Trouve's best surface, Indoor Hard, stands at 50%.
- In terms of the event level, Chidekh exhibits better performance at the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments, winning 75.68% compared to Trouve's 42.86%, potentially indicating greater competition experience.
- Chidekh has faced more challenging opponents on average (rank 351.32) than Trouve (rank 504), highlighting Chidekh's competitive experience.
- If the match proceeds to a deciding set, Trouve has a slight edge, winning 40% compared to Chidekh's 36% in the last year.
- Regarding breakpoint conversion, Trouve is slightly more effective, converting 31.25% of opportunities, while Chidekh achieves 28.65%.
Editorial Prediction (May 19, 2025, UTC):
The upcoming tennis match promises to be an engaging contest between Trouve and Chidekh. Upon examining their performance records, certain patterns emerge that could forecast the match's outcome.
Chidekh seems to possess a definitive upper hand in key areas such as second serve performance, overall match win percentage, and playing experience against higher-ranked opponents. These factors are indicative of Chidekh's ability to maintain strong pressure and navigate challenging competitive landscapes effectively.
Trouve, however, outshines in particular areas such as return game efficiency and breakpoint conversion, suggesting that Trouve can capitalize on fleeting chances during crucial match points.
Nevertheless, given the breadth of Chidekh's consistency and competitive experience on advantageous surfaces, it is reasonable to predict that Chidekh is most likely to emerge victorious in this forthcoming match.
Clement Chidekh vs Nathan Trouve Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
C. Chidekh vs N. Trouve H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 17 | Games Won | 15 |
| 4 | Aces (Total) | 11 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 6 |
| 2:19:33 | Average Match Time | 2:19:33 |
| 62% (72/117) | 1st Serve % | 70% (77/110) |
| 61% (44/72) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (52/77) |
| 62% (28/45) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (15/33) |
| 27% (3/11) | Break Pts Won % | 25% (2/8) |
| 39% (43/110) | Return Points Win % | 38% (45/117) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
C. Chidekh Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 7-5 6-3 | ||
R2 | L | 6-7(5) 6-2 6-4 | ||
R1 | W | 6-4 1-6 6-4 | ||
QF | L | 6-4 7-5 | ||
R2 | W | 6-7(7) 6-2 6-2 | ||
N. Trouve Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | L | 7-6(4) 6-3 | ||
Q1 | L | 1-6 6-3 6-1 | ||
R1 | L | 6-2 6-2 | ||
Q1 | L | 6-3 6-4 | ||
Q3 | L | 6-4 5-7 6-4 | ||

C. Chidekh vs N. Trouve Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 65.20% (193/103) | YTD Win/Loss | 37.93% (11/18) |
| 62.39% (423/255) | Sets Win/Loss | 40.91% (27/39) |
| 55.03% (3426/2800) | Games Win/Loss | 47.51% (286/316) |
| 69.01% (98/44) | Hard Win/Loss | 40.91% (9/13) |
| 43.75% (7/9) | Clay Win/Loss | 33.33% (1/2) |
| 64.44% (87/48) | Indoor Hard W/L | 25.00% (1/3) |
| 33.33% (1/2) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.22 | Aces Per Game | 0.23 |
| 671 | Aces Total | 69 |
| 0.3 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.21 |
| 913 | Total Double Faults | 61 |
| 1:35:6 | Average Match Time | 1:2:38 |
| 416.95 | Average Opponent Rank | 322.34 |
| 62% (11669/18812) | 1st Serve % | 62% (841/1361) |
| 67% (7852/11669) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (533/841) |
| 52% (3684/7143) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (243/520) |
| 46% (1015/2211) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (56/136) |
| 43% (8368/19447) | Return Points Win % | 41% (534/1315) |
| 40.00% (2/3) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 44.44% (4/5) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 52.58% (51/46) | Challenger W/L | 16.67% (1/5) |
| 73.51% (136/49) | Futures W/L | 43.48% (10/13) |
| 65% (189/291) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 38% (11/29) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (32/64) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (3/6) |
| 55% (49/89) | Deciding Set Win % | 38% (3/8) |
| 91% (190/172) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 83% (12/10) |
| 9% (190/18) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 17% (12/2) |
| 19% (106/20) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 6% (17/1) |